Resistance vs. Aerobic Training: The Best Blend for You

In the ever-evolving landscape of fitness, the debate between resistance and aerobic training continues to challenge both fitness enthusiasts and newcomers alike. If you’ve found yourself wondering whether to prioritise weights or cardio, you’re not alone. Many Australians struggle to determine the optimal exercise approach, especially when specific health or weight management goals are at stake. The science is clear: both training modalities offer distinct benefits, but their true power may lie in their strategic combination.

What Are Resistance and Aerobic Training?

Resistance training (also called strength or weight training) involves exercises that cause your muscles to contract against an external resistance, stimulating muscle growth and strength development. Common forms include:

• Free weights (dumbbells, barbells)
• Weight machines
• Resistance bands
• Bodyweight exercises (push-ups, squats)

Aerobic training, conversely, focuses on continuous, rhythmic activities that elevate your heart rate and breathing for extended periods. These exercises enhance cardiovascular endurance and typically include:

• Walking, jogging, running
• Swimming
• Cycling
• Rowing
• Group fitness classes like aerobics or dance

These fundamentally different approaches trigger distinct physiological adaptations. According to Australia’s physical activity guidelines, adults should aim for 150-300 minutes of moderate aerobic activity weekly, complemented by at least two resistance training sessions. Yet only 24.6% of Australian adults currently meet these combined exercise recommendations.

How Do These Training Types Affect Your Body Differently?

Understanding the physiological impacts of each training style can help you make informed decisions about your exercise regimen.

Cardiovascular System Effects

Aerobic training induces profound structural and functional changes in your cardiovascular system. Regular participation in activities like running or cycling:

• Increases stroke volume by 10-20% through left ventricular hypertrophy
• Lowers resting heart rate by 5-15 beats per minute within 8-12 weeks
• Enhances oxygen extraction capabilities at the muscular level
• Reduces visceral adipose tissue by 12-18% in overweight populations

Resistance training, while less celebrated for cardiovascular benefits, still produces significant effects:

• Reduces central blood pressure through improved arterial compliance
• Decreases systolic blood pressure by 4-7 mmHg in hypertensive individuals
• Improves endothelial function

When combined, these modalities demonstrate additive effects, with research showing 10% greater reductions in cardiovascular risk scores compared to aerobic-only programs.

Musculoskeletal Impacts

The musculoskeletal system responds differently to each exercise stimulus:

Resistance training at 60-80% of one-repetition maximum:

• Induces muscle fibre hypertrophy
• Increases muscle cross-sectional area by 8-12% per month in beginners
• Elevates resting metabolic rate by 100-150 kcal/day through increased lean mass
• Significantly improves bone mineral density

Aerobic training:

• Maintains bone mineral density through ground reaction forces (particularly in weight-bearing activities)
• Provides minimal stimulation for muscle hypertrophy
• Enhances muscular endurance rather than size or maximum strength

Contrary to traditional beliefs about the “interference effect,” recent meta-analyses show minimal negative impact when combining these training styles appropriately.

Aspect	Resistance Training	Aerobic Training	Combined Approach
Fat Loss	Moderate (1.5 kg over 8 months)	High (4.1 kg over 8 months)	High with preserved muscle
Muscle Gain	High (1.4 kg increase in lean mass)	Minimal to none	Moderate to high
Metabolic Rate	Increases by 100-150 kcal/day	Temporary elevation post-exercise	Highest overall impact
Blood Pressure	Reduces by 4-7 mmHg (systolic)	Reduces by 5-7 mmHg (systolic)	Greatest overall reduction
Insulin Sensitivity	Improves through increased muscle mass	Enhances via GLUT4 translocation	58% reduced diabetes risk
Time Efficiency	High benefit per minute	Moderate benefit per minute	Requires strategic planning

Which Training Style Is Best for Weight Management?

When it comes to weight management, both training styles offer valuable but different contributions.

Aerobic training excels at creating an immediate caloric deficit. The STRRIDE AT/RT trial demonstrated that over 8 months, aerobic training alone reduced fat mass by 4.1 kg compared to 1.5 kg for resistance training. This makes it particularly effective for initial weight loss efforts, with research showing potential for 2-3% body mass reduction monthly in obese individuals.

Resistance training, though less impactful for immediate fat loss, offers crucial metabolic advantages:

• Preserves and builds lean muscle mass (1.4 kg increase on average)
• Prevents metabolic rate decline during caloric restriction
• Creates lasting metabolic improvements that support long-term weight management

For optimal results, evidence suggests a phased approach:

1. Initial focus on aerobic exercise to maximise early weight loss
2. Gradual integration of resistance training after 12 weeks to counteract muscle catabolism
3. Maintenance phase with balanced attention to both modalities

This strategic combination preserves metabolic health while driving sustainable fat loss—a key consideration for long-term weight management success.

Dr. Stephen Boutcher, an exercise physiologist at the University of New South Wales, explains: “The combination of resistance and aerobic training creates a metabolic environment that not only burns calories during exercise but continues to enhance energy expenditure for hours afterward through increased muscle mass and elevated post-exercise oxygen consumption.”

How Can You Effectively Combine Both Training Types?

Implementing a well-balanced exercise program requires thoughtful planning and progression.

Beginner-Friendly Integration Strategies

If you’re new to exercise or returning after a long break:

1. Start with 2-3 days of aerobic training at moderate intensity (able to talk but not sing)
2. Add 1-2 days of full-body resistance training with 1-2 sets of 8-12 repetitions
3. Allow at least one day between resistance sessions for the same muscle groups
4. Focus on proper form rather than weight or intensity

Intermediate Programming Approaches

For those with established exercise habits:

1. Consider a 3-2 split (three days aerobic, two days resistance) or a 2-3 split based on your primary goals
2. Progress resistance training to 3-4 sets per exercise
3. Incorporate periodization by cycling through phases of endurance, hypertrophy, and strength focus
4. Experiment with session sequencing—research suggests performing resistance before aerobic training when prioritising strength gains

Advanced Programming Considerations

Experienced exercisers can optimise further:

1. Explore concurrent training with appropriate recovery periods (≥6 hours between sessions)
2. Implement polarized training models (80% low-intensity aerobic work with strategic high-intensity sessions)
3. Adjust work:rest ratios based on goals (1:1 for endurance, 1:3-1:6 for strength)
4. Consider split routines for resistance training while maintaining aerobic work

For time-constrained individuals, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) provides comparable cardiometabolic benefits to traditional aerobic protocols in just 20-30 minute sessions.

What Does Science Say About the Optimal Training Balance?

Contemporary research has revolutionised our understanding of exercise integration. The traditional concern about significant “interference effects” (aerobic training undermining strength gains) has been largely disproven by recent meta-analyses.

A 2022 analysis of 1,090 subjects found concurrent training caused no statistically meaningful differences in strength gains or hypertrophy compared to resistance-only protocols when sessions were separated appropriately. Only explosive strength development showed modest impairment, suggesting power athletes should carefully plan their training sequence.

For chronic disease management, the complementary effects become even more pronounced:

• Diabetes management benefits equally from both modalities but through distinct pathways
• Combined training synergistically reduces diabetes incidence by 58% in high-risk populations
• For osteoarthritis patients, resistance training’s joint-stabilizing effects combine with aerobic exercise’s anti-inflammatory benefits to reduce pain scores by 40-60%

The scientific consensus points toward personalisation based on:

1. Primary health and fitness goals
2. Current fitness level and health status
3. Available time and resources
4. Personal preferences and enjoyment factors

Professor Maria Fiatarone Singh from the University of Sydney emphasises: “The evidence consistently demonstrates that combining resistance and aerobic training yields superior health outcomes across virtually all parameters compared to exclusive focus on either modality alone.”

Designing Your Optimal Training Blend

The ideal exercise program is one you can sustain long-term. Consider these evidence-based principles when creating your approach:

1. Assess your primary goals: Weight management, muscle development, cardiovascular health, or general wellness will all influence your optimal ratio.
2. Start where you are: Begin with manageable volumes and intensities, gradually progressing over time.
3. Consider your time constraints: Even short sessions produce benefits when consistently applied. Quality trumps quantity.
4. Monitor your response: Pay attention to how your body recovers and adapts, adjusting as needed.
5. Prioritise consistency: Regular participation in both forms of exercise, even at moderate intensities, yields better results than sporadic high-intensity efforts.

For many Australians, particularly those focused on weight management, a balanced program might include:

• 3-5 aerobic sessions weekly (150-300 minutes total)
• 2-3 resistance training sessions targeting all major muscle groups
• Appropriate recovery periods between challenging sessions
• Gradual progression in both intensity and volume

Remember that physical activity guidelines are minimum thresholds, not upper limits. Finding joy in movement remains the most reliable predictor of long-term exercise adherence.

Skip the struggles. Our patients achieve <20.2% weight reduction with medical weight loss treatments delivered straight to their door. No clinics. No waiting. Just results. See if you’re eligible for our medical weight loss treatments – take our quiz.